DCCC Chair: GOP Opposition To National Security Funds Will Be Issue In 2010

Democratic leadership in Congress is pledging to make Republican votes against key national security and defense funding measures a feature in the upcoming congressional elections, following the botched Christmas Day terrorist attack aboard a Detroit-bound airliner.


Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Chris Van Hollen (D-M.D.) told the Huffington Post on Wednesday that it was the committee's duty to ensure that, come 2010, the American people are aware that House Republicans opposed a Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill that included funding for airport security.

The 2010 appropriations bill contained Transportation Security Administration funding for explosives detection systems and other security measures -- it was opposed by House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio), Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.), and Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) among others.

"It is not so much that the DCCC will be holding people accountable but the American people will be holding people accountable. They deserve to have that info and we will make sure they have it," Van Hollen said, in an interview that took place Wednesday afternoon. "And I'm assuming our Republican colleagues will have an opportunity to explain why they voted against additional resources for homeland security."

The same dynamic would hold true in the Senate, where a procedural play by Republican senators to derail health care reform by nearly killing a separate bill to fund defense operations would be held against them, predicted Van Hollen predicted.

"I think we are going to be very interested in the rationale for those votes," said the Maryland Democrat. "I mean in the Senate you have the situation where Republicans were delaying a vote on the defense appropriations bill for the purpose of slowing down health care reform and I think the American people don't want our national security to be held hostage to Republican procedural gamesmanship on health care."
Read more )
 
 
30 December 2009 @ 03:06 pm
What is your favorite invention, or improved product in the show? Mine is the punching bag that does the punching for you in "Why must I be a crustacean in Love?"

Honorable mention to anything we use today that is just floating.
 
 



Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich reiterated his belief that the U.S. should begin to "profile," and "frankly discriminate against" people in order to prevent another attempted attack.

On Fox News today, Gingrich first said that "the entire administration's approach is fundamentally wrong," and that "we have to be honest about our enemies."

"I think that we have to be prepared to profile based on behavior. Not ethnic profiling, not racial profiling, but look at people's behavior," he said.

He continued:

The fact is we are faced with an enemy, driven by religion. The extremist wing of Islam. A minority but nonetheless definable. We should be honest about this. We should target the people who are engaged in that community.

Gingrich also said that "we should methodically isolate, and frankly discriminate against" that community.

He then slammed the Obama administration for its decision to try the Flight 253 suspect in a criminal court: "This administration doesn't believe in interrogations, it believes in giving terrorists all the rights of an American citizen, which is fundamentally wrong if you are in a war."

Newt went on:

Terrorists are combatants. They should be dealt with as combatants. They should be interrogated by the intelligence community. They should not be interrogated by the FBI. They shouldn't be read their Miranda rights. They are not American citizens.

These remarks are a continuation of Gingrich's push for more profiling in national security, which he kicked off yesterday with series of angry tweets.

source